A new report from Jabra has revealed fresh insights into assessing workplace productivity and the vast disparities at the C-suite and executive level around its accountability and success.
Jabra conducted in-depth interviews with 688 CEOs and C-level executives in the US, UK, France, Germany, Sweden and Denmark. The subsequent report, The Technology Paradox: C-suite perspectives on the productivity puzzle, reveals deep divisions among CEOs and C-level executives over who should take ownership of productivity. While a third (31%) of CEOs said it was the Board’s responsibility, over half (52%) of C-level executives said that the CEO should take ownership.
Although seven in ten businesses (71%) say that measuring productivity is important, more than half of C-level respondents (56%) believe that it is difficult to measure productivity.
Holger Reisinger, SVP for Enterprise Solutions at Jabra said, “optimising productivity is one of the biggest challenges facing advanced economies across the world today, but our research shows that businesses are no closer to taking a strategic approach to solving the problem. This is an issue that demands real leadership, yet senior leaders cannot decide who’s responsible. This is clearly the first step towards improving productivity, but it must be followed by real engagement with employees about their preferred ways of working.”
The report also revealed a deep disconnect between C-level executives and their employees over the most productive working environment. Around two-thirds of C-levels (61%) say that working in the office achieves higher productivity.
Knowledge workers overwhelmingly say that they are most productive in single or private offices, with almost half (44%) picking this among their top two choices of working environments. By contrast, only 17 per cent identified open offices among their top choices.
The research also suggests that technology is contributing to the productivity problem. More than one in ten (11%) of knowledge workers said that interruptions from digital devices affect their productivity, while the proportion of those saying they are distracted by multiple messages coming through to their softphones and audio devices rose from six to eight per cent since 2015. This contrasts with the fact that two thirds (62%) of C-level respondents believe that encouraging the use of multiple communications platforms aids productivity.
Holger added, “business leaders admit that evaluating productivity is difficult, and our research reveals that different countries take different approaches to measuring it. Surely one of the most effective ways of improving knowledge worker’s productivity is actually to listen to their concerns about distractions and to take account of their preferred working environment. Yet the figures show that there is a chasm between workers and the C-Suite – for example, over the preferences for open offices and the benefits of using multiple communications technologies.
“The C-Suite seems wedded to the idea that more technology must result in improved productivity. While this may be the case for some workers, it may have the opposite effect on others. The only way to make workers more productive – and, indeed, happier – in their jobs is to engage with them. But for that to happen, every organisation first needs to be clear about who owns the issue of productivity."
The full report can be downloaded at www.blogdata.jabra.com/c-suite-global-productivity-insights/